loading

PPE Testing Equipment Manufacturer | Safety Equipment Testing Machines | GESTER


Products

10 maintenance methods commonly used in instruments and meters

How to repair the instrument when it fails? Today, I will introduce to you the commonly used maintenance methods of instruments and meters. 1. Knocking hand pressure method When we use testing instruments, we often encounter the phenomenon of good and bad when the instrument is running. Most of this phenomenon is caused by poor contact or virtual welding. In this case, tapping and hand pressing can be used. So-called“tap”It is to tap the plug-in board or component lightly with a small rubber hammer or other knocking object to see if it will cause an error or downtime. so-called“hand press”That is, when a fault occurs, after turning off the power, press the plugged parts, plugs and sockets firmly by hand again, and then turn on the power to try whether the fault will be eliminated. If you find that tapping on the casing is normal, and hitting it again is abnormal, it is best to reinsert all the connectors and try again. 2. Observation method Use sight, smell and touch. Sometimes, damaged components will discolor, blister or have burnt spots; burnt components will produce some special odor; shorted chips will become hot; virtual soldering or desoldering can also be observed with the naked eye. . 3. Elimination method The so-called elimination method is a method of judging the cause of the failure by plugging in some plug-in boards and devices in the machine. When the instrument returns to normal after a plug-in board or device is removed, it means that the fault occurs there. 4. The replacement method requires two instruments of the same model or sufficient spare parts. Replace a good spare with the same component on the faulty machine to see if the fault is eliminated. 5. Comparison method It is required to have two instruments of the same model, and one of them is in normal operation. Using this method also requires the necessary equipment, such as a multimeter, oscilloscope, etc. According to the nature of comparison, there are voltage comparison, waveform comparison, static impedance comparison, output result comparison, current comparison and so on. The specific method is: let the faulty detection instrument and the normal detection instrument operate under the same conditions, and then detect the signals of some points and then compare the two groups of signals measured. If there is a difference, it can be concluded that the fault is here. This method requires the maintenance personnel to have considerable knowledge and skills. 6. Heating and cooling method Sometimes, the detection instrument works for a long time, or when the temperature of the working environment is high in summer, it will fail. Shut down and check normally, stop for a period of time and then start it again, and then fail again after a while. This phenomenon is due to the poor performance of individual ICs or components, and the high temperature characteristic parameters do not meet the index requirements. In order to find out the cause of the failure, the heating and cooling method can be used. The so-called cooling is to use cotton fiber to wipe the anhydrous alcohol on the part that may fail to cool down when the failure occurs, and observe whether the failure is eliminated. The so-called temperature rise is to artificially raise the ambient temperature. For example, use an electric soldering iron to approach the suspicious part (be careful not to raise the temperature too high to damage the normal device) to see if the fault occurs. 7. Shoulder-riding method The shoulder-riding method is also called the parallel method. Put a good IC chip on the chip to be checked, or connect good components (resistor capacitors, diodes, transistors, etc.) in parallel with the components to be checked, and maintain good contact. If the fault comes from the internal open circuit of the device or Reasons such as poor contact can be ruled out by this method. 8. Capacitor bypass method When a certain circuit produces a strange phenomenon, such as when the display is chaotic, the capacitor bypass method can be used to determine the part of the circuit that is likely to fail. Connect the capacitor across the power supply and ground of the IC; connect the transistor circuit across the base input or collector output to observe the effect on the fault phenomenon. If the failure phenomenon disappears when the capacitor bypass input terminal is invalid and its output terminal is bypassed, it is determined that the fault occurs in this stage of the circuit. 9. State adjustment method Generally speaking, before the fault is determined, do not touch the components in the circuit casually, especially the adjustable devices, such as potentiometers. However, if the double reference measures are taken in advance (for example, the position is marked or the voltage value or resistance value is measured before being touched), it is still allowed to be touched if necessary. Maybe after the change sometimes the glitch will go away. 10. Isolation method The fault isolation method does not require the same type of equipment or spare parts for comparison, and is safe and reliable. According to the fault detection flow chart, the division and encirclement gradually narrow the fault search range, and then cooperate with methods such as signal comparison and component exchange to find the fault location very quickly.

need huge investment, so it is important to shop with caution.

If you are interested in any of textile testing equipment, please feel free to contact us.

GESTER Instruments clearly and succinctly expresses what our company is all about. Strong brands cut through the noise to grab the audience and immediately shed light on the character of the product or service.

Rewards and discount programs give customers more reason to come back for textile testing equipment again, especially in the competitive retail and services markets.

The trend toward using tensile tester manufacturers textile testing equipment to ease tensile tester manufacturers, once established, soon extended into such additional fields as tensile tester manufacturers and tensile tester manufacturers.

GET IN TOUCH WITH Us
recommended articles
What Are the ISTA Standard Tests and ISTA Testing Equipment?
ISTA (International Safe Transit Association) standard tests are globally recognized transportation packaging test procedures designed to evaluate the safety and reliability of products and their packaging throughout the logistics chain. By simulating real-world transportation conditions such as drops, vibration, impact, stacking, and compression, ISTA testing helps identify potential packaging weaknesses before products enter large-scale distribution. ISTA testing equipment—including drop testers, vibration testers, incline impact machines, and compression testers—plays a critical role in accurately reproducing these conditions under laboratory settings. Proper selection and use of ISTA-compliant equipment enable manufacturers to reduce transportation damage, lower return costs, enhance packaging design, and improve customer confidence in product quality and logistics safety.
Whole Shoes Flexing Tester GT-KA01-2: An Ultimate Guide to Its Benefits and Applications
The Whole Shoes Flexing Tester GT-KA01-2 is an advanced footwear testing instrument designed to evaluate the flexing resistance and durability of finished shoes. By simulating repeated walking and bending movements, it helps manufacturers identify cracks, material fatigue, and structural weaknesses in footwear products. Compliant with SATRA TM92, ISO 24266 Method A, and HG/T 2871-2022 Method B, this testing machine provides accurate, repeatable, and reliable results for sports shoes, casual shoes, work shoes, and other footwear types. This guide explores its features, benefits, industry applications, and frequently asked questions to help footwear manufacturers improve product quality and meet international testing requirements.
DIN Abrasion Tester vs Taber Abraser: What Is the Difference?

Choosing the right abrasion testing equipment is essential for obtaining accurate and repeatable wear resistance results. DIN Abrasion Tester and Taber Abrasion Tester are two widely used abrasion testing machines, but they are designed for different material types and testing purposes.

This article provides a detailed comparison between DIN Abrasion Tester and Taber Abraser, covering their working principles, specimen requirements, industry applications, standard compliance, technical characteristics, operation features and practical advantages. DIN Abrasion Tester is mainly designed for rubber, elastic materials, tires, conveyor belts and footwear soles, while Taber Abrasion Tester is suitable for flat materials such as coatings, textiles, plastics, leather, metals and decorative surfaces.

By understanding the differences between these two abrasion testing methods, laboratories can select the most suitable abrasion tester based on sample geometry, testing standards and production quality control requirements.
How to Find a Professional Safety Glove Testing Machine Manufacturer with CE Certification?
With the global PPE market’s rapid growth, choosing a professional CE-certified safety glove testing machine manufacturer is critical for data integrity and international compliance. This article explains why CE certification is non-negotiable (ensuring EU safety/quality standards), outlines essential test items (abrasion, cut, thermal protection per EN 388/EN 407), highlights core instruments (GESTER GT-KC28 TDM Cut Tester, GT-KC29 Cutting Tester, GT-C101 Heat Contact Machine), and details how to evaluate suppliers (20+ years of experience, partnerships with SGS/Bureau Veritas, ISO 9001 certification, after-sales support). It also covers the benefits of OEM/ODM capabilities for customized solutions. Ultimately, partnering with trusted manufacturers like GESTER ensures high-precision, compliant testing to protect workers and meet global market requirements.
A Complete Guide to Martindale Testing by the Best Martindale Abrasion Tester Supplier
Durability is critical for textiles and footwear, and Martindale testing is the gold standard for measuring abrasion resistance and pilling performance. This guide dives into Martindale testing’s core mechanics (Lissajous figure multi-directional friction), strategies to boost testing accuracy (sample clamping, load calibration, abrasive standardization), and compliance with international standards (ISO 12947, ASTM D4966, EN). As a top Martindale abrasion tester supplier with 25+ years of expertise, GESTER International delivers high-precision instruments (Martindale Abrasion Tester GT-C13B, etc.) certified to ISO 9001 and trusted by SGS, Bureau Veritas, and other global testing institutes. Beyond machinery, GESTER offers global technical support, on-site installation, and calibration services. The guide also includes a procurement framework to help labs select tailored Martindale testing solutions. For reliable, standard-compliant durability testing, GESTER is your trusted partner.
How to Test Firefighter Turnout Gear Thermal Protection?
Firefighter turnout gear plays a critical role in protecting firefighters operating in extreme environments involving high temperatures, flames, radiant heat, and convective heat. Its thermal protective performance directly affects firefighter safety and survival during fireground operations. This article explains how to test firefighter turnout gear thermal protection through Thermal Protective Performance (TPP) testing. It introduces the scientific principle based on the Stoll curve, outlines key influencing factors such as heat flux intensity and exposure time, and reviews internationally recognized standards including NFPA 1971 and ISO 17492. The article also highlights the testing advantages of the GT-RC02 TPP Thermal Protection Tester, which provides accurate, stable, and standards-compliant evaluation of flame-retardant protective clothing materials under combined radiant and convective heat exposure.
What is EN 149 & Why is it Important?
EN 149 is the core European standard for particle-filtering half masks and FFP respirators. This article elaborates on the definition, structure, performance classification, marking rules and core advantages of EN 149, compares it with NIOSH N95, KN95, EN 143 and medical mask standards, and lists industry application scenarios, as well as professional mask and filter testing instruments compliant with EN 149 testing requirements.
10 Benefits of GESTER PPE Testing Equipment You Need to Know
Choosing PPE testing equipment requires more than comparing machine prices. Measurement accuracy, test repeatability, applicable standards, fixture design, automation, calibration, customization and technical support can directly affect laboratory efficiency and testing reliability. GESTER provides integrated PPE testing solutions covering safety footwear, protective gloves, protective clothing, masks and safety helmets. This article explains 10 technical advantages to consider when comparing GESTER PPE Testing Equipment with alternative suppliers.
How to Choose the Right Glove Testing Equipment
Choosing the right glove testing equipment is essential for evaluating the safety, durability, and protective performance of gloves. This guide explains the main types of glove testing equipment, including thermal protection, cut and abrasion resistance, tensile strength, and environmental conditioning equipment. It also introduces key glove testing standards such as EN 388, EN ISO 13997, ISO 37, ASTM D412, ISO 12947, and related thermal protection standards. By understanding your testing requirements, applicable standards, sample conditioning needs, maintenance requirements, and budget, you can build a more efficient and standard-compliant glove testing laboratory.
ISO 20345 vs ASTM F2413: Differences Between Safety Footwear Standards
ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413 are the two most recognized safety footwear standards used worldwide to evaluate protective footwear performance. Although both standards define minimum requirements for impact resistance and compression protection, differences in test energy levels, compression loads, marking systems, and hazard classifications can affect certification results. This article explains the key differences between ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413, helping footwear manufacturers, exporters, and quality control teams select the correct testing standard and improve compliance with international safety requirements.
GESTER International Co., Ltd. gains certificates of ISO 9001, 3A and SGS Audited supplier etc. with advanced design concept, excellent manufacturing technology and strict quality control.
WeChat
Contact us
Tel: +86-595-28886108 
Fax: +86-595-22515221
E-mail: sales10@gester-instruments.com,
                 info@gester-instruments.com
Mobile/Whatapp/ Wechat:  
             + 86(0)18059985379
Address:  No.15, Chifeng Road,Licheng Region, Quanzhou city of Fujian,PR China.
Customer service
detect