loading

PPE Testing Equipment Manufacturer | Safety Equipment Testing Machines | GESTER


Products

Analysis of sponge resilience test method (GB/T6670-2008)1

The national standard GB/T6670-2008 replaced GB/T6670-1997 'Determination of Resilience Performance of Flexible Foam Plastics' to 'Determination of Resilience Performance of Flexible Foam Polymeric Materials by Falling Ball MethodMethod A and Method B. Details of the determination of the resilience performance of the flexible foam polymer material by the falling ball method: 1. Test range: 1.1 specifies two methods for determining the resilience performance of the flexible foam polymer material. 1.2 It is suitable for the determination of the rebound performance of soft foam polymer materials. 2. The following terms and definitions apply to this standard. 2.1 Open-cell soft foam material: a soft foam material with a closed cell volume of less than 25%. 2.2 Closed-cell flexible foam: a flexible foam material with a closed cell volume greater than 25%. Principle: A steel ball with a certain quality and diameter is dropped from a fixed height to the surface of the sample, the height of the steel ball is measured, and the percentage of the ratio of the height of the steel ball to the drop height is calculated. Method A, testing equipment and main parameters: Sponge ball rebound resilience tester, including a transparent tube with an inner diameter of 30mm~60mm, a steel ball with a diameter of 16mm±0.5mm, a mass of 16.8g±1.5g, and a magnet or other The device is released. There is no rotation during the fall, and it is always in the center position. The drop height is 500mm±0.5mm. The top of the ball should be 516mm from the surface of the sample. Therefore, the origin of zero rebound is the diameter distance of the steel ball above the surface of the sample. If the pipe is not vertical, it may cause measurement errors. The steel ball touches the inner wall of the pipe during the falling or rebounding process, and the measurement result is invalid. Use a level or similar device to calibrate the hard reference surface to ensure levelness, and place the transparent tube and the frame vertically. 3. Manual reading equipment: On the back of the tube, draw scale lines in an orderly manner, with a large scale every 5% (25mm) and a small scale every 1% (5mm), with an angle of 120° arc. This complete circle marking is an indispensable and important part of the instrument, and it can eliminate parallax errors. Automatic reading device: an instrument that can electronically display the rebound height of the steel ball. It has been verified that the result is the same as the manual reading. The rebound height can be calculated by the rebound speed of the steel ball or the time interval from the first time the steel ball touches the foam surface to the second time. The installed electronic equipment should show an accuracy of ±1% (5mm) of the height. The pipe of the device does not need to be graduated. Method B, testing equipment and main parameters: the same equipment as Method A, the foam falling ball resilience tester, with manual reading equipment and automatic reading equipment. The digital display of the falling ball rebound tester has a relative error of less than 1.5%. The main parameters of the steel ball diameter are the same as those of Method A, and the steel ball mass is 16.3g (0.5g lighter than the 5.1 steel ball). The important different parameters are: the drop height of the steel ball is 460mm±0.5mm. Therefore, the rebound value measured by method A and method B cannot be directly converted. Test sample (polyurethane material): 1. The sample should have parallel and flat surfaces up and down. 2. The sample area is 100mm±100mm, and the height should meet 50m. If the thickness of the sample is less than 50mm, it should be stacked to 50mm, but adhesives cannot be used. For model products, the upper skin should be removed. Note: For soft materials, if the result has a large error, a thicker sample can be used instead of the 50mm thickness limit. For ultra-low-density materials, the test results may be problematic due to the sample itself. For multilayer sheet samples, interlayer sliding is prone to occur. It is best to use a larger area sample to overcome it. Number of samples: 3 samples for each group. Three samples can be taken in the same sample block or in the same batch of different sample blocks. Condition adjustment: After the material is made, it can be tested for at least 72h. If it can be proved, the difference between the result obtained 16h or 48h after production and the result obtained 72h after production does not exceed ±10%. Allow samples to be tested 16h or 48h after production. Before the test, the sample should be adjusted in any of the following environments for more than 16 hours.

If you are sourcing for product development or manufacturing operations, you won't miss GESTER International Co.,Limited's list of offer.

We want to continue to organize GESTER to make it more efficient and profitable so that both, our clients and our employees can get more out of their time.

Rewards and discount programs give customers more reason to come back for textile testing equipment again, especially in the competitive retail and services markets.

GET IN TOUCH WITH Us
recommended articles
ISO 20345 vs ASTM F2413: Differences Between Safety Footwear Standards
ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413 are the two most recognized safety footwear standards used worldwide to evaluate protective footwear performance. Although both standards define minimum requirements for impact resistance and compression protection, differences in test energy levels, compression loads, marking systems, and hazard classifications can affect certification results. This article explains the key differences between ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413, helping footwear manufacturers, exporters, and quality control teams select the correct testing standard and improve compliance with international safety requirements.
What is the Safety Footwear Impact Tester & Why are They Important in Safety Shoes Testing
A Safety Footwear Impact Tester evaluates the impact resistance of safety shoes by striking the steel toe cap with 100J/200J kinetic energy, ensuring compliance with global standards (EN ISO 20344, ASTM F2412). It’s critical for verifying product protection, facilitating certification, and optimizing safety shoe design. GESTER Instruments offers reliable, user-friendly testers trusted by manufacturers and labs worldwide.
How to Choose the Right DIN Abrasion Tester
This article provides a comprehensive guide to selecting the right DIN Abrasion Tester for material wear performance evaluation. It covers the instrument's function, applicable standards (including ISO 20344, DIN-53516, ISO 4649, ASTM D5963), key features like digital counter and auto-stop, application scope for rubber, tires, shoe soles, and conveyor belts, as well as quality, construction, brand considerations, and FAQs on troubleshooting. Ideal for laboratories, quality inspection departments, and material research institutions.
Mask Testing Equipment: Everything You Need to Know
This article comprehensively introduces mask testing equipment, including its definition, application significance, core international testing standards, main equipment types and functional characteristics. It also puts forward a step-by-step selection guide and common selection misunderstandings, providing a reference for mask manufacturers, third-party testing institutions and regulatory departments to select appropriate testing equipment, so as to ensure mask product quality, pass international certification and protect user safety.
Top Features of a Certified TDM Cut Resistance Tester Supplier for Laboratory Use
The demand for precise PPE safety testing has surged with the evolution of protective gear, making TDM (Tomodynamometer) cut resistance testing a critical process for evaluating protective gloves and industrial textiles. This article details the top features of a certified TDM cut resistance tester supplier for laboratory use, including compliance with international standards (EN 388, ISO 13997, ASTM F2992), high-precision mechanical engineering, automated workflows, robust data management, and integrated safety features. It highlights GESTER International Co., Ltd.—a 20+ year experienced manufacturer with ISO 9001 certification and partnerships with SGS, Intertek, and TUV—as a leading supplier, offering the GT-KC28 TDM Cut Test Machine and comprehensive services (on-site installation, calibration, global technical support). For laboratories seeking reliable, standard-compliant testing solutions to validate PPE safety claims, this article provides actionable insights into strategic procurement. Visit https://www.gesterinstruments.com/ for more technical specifications and PPE testing solutions.
What is EN 149 & Why is it Important?
EN 149 is the core European standard for particle-filtering half masks and FFP respirators. This article elaborates on the definition, structure, performance classification, marking rules and core advantages of EN 149, compares it with NIOSH N95, KN95, EN 143 and medical mask standards, and lists industry application scenarios, as well as professional mask and filter testing instruments compliant with EN 149 testing requirements.
PPE Trends: Insights from a China Top PPE Testing Machine Company
As 2026 approaches, the global PPE industry is transformed by stricter industrial safety regulations, healthcare awareness, and evolving international standards (ISO/ASTM/EN). Key trends include the rise of Smart PPE, adoption of sustainable bio-based materials, and converging global compliance requirements—demanding high-precision, automated testing equipment with data traceability. GESTER International Co., Ltd., a China top PPE testing machine company with 25+ years of expertise, addresses these challenges through modular, standards-aligned solutions (e.g., TPP Thermal Protection Tester GT-RC02A, TDM Cut Test Machine GT-KC28) and long-term partnerships with SGS, TUV, and Intertek. Offering global technical support (installation, calibration, training) and automated, multi-standard-compatible equipment, GESTER empowers PPE manufacturers to meet 2026’s rigorous safety benchmarks. This article explores PPE performance evolution, 2026 industry trends, technological testing responses, and strategic procurement tips—emphasizing how China’s leading testing machine providers bridge hardware innovation with global compliance to protect human life. For professional PPE testing solutions, visit https://www.gesterinstruments.com/.
Why GESTER Ranks as a Leading TPP Thermal Protective Performance Tester Exporter
As a trusted leading TPP Thermal Protective Performance Tester exporter, GESTER International Co., Ltd. brings 25+ years of R&D and manufacturing expertise to PPE safety testing. Our flagship GT-RC02 series TPP testers feature advanced dual-source thermal simulation, high-sensitivity sensors, and full digital automation—delivering precise, repeatable data to evaluate thermal protection for firefighter and industrial protective clothing. Fully compliant with global standards (NFPA 1971, EN 469, ISO), GESTER’s equipment is trusted by SGS, Intertek, and top testing institutes worldwide. Backed by ISO 9001 certification, global service in 160+ countries, and professional calibration support, we empower manufacturers and labs to meet stringent safety regulations and ensure life-saving thermal protection. Discover tailored TPP testing solutions for PPE excellence at GESTER.
Universal Testing Machine Dual Column GT-K01: A Reliable Solution for footwear Testing
The Universal Testing Machine Dual Column GT-K01 is a high-precision mechanical testing instrument widely used in the footwear industry to evaluate tensile, compression, bending, tearing, and bonding strength of various materials. With advanced servo control, high-accuracy displacement measurement, and compliance with multiple international testing standards such as SATRA, ASTM, ISO, and BS, the GT-K01 footwear universal testing machine provides reliable data for quality control, material research, and product certification. This article explores the working capabilities, structural features, and practical value of the GT-K01 universal testing machine in footwear testing and manufacturing processes.
Whole Shoes Flexing Tester GT-KA01-2: An Ultimate Guide to Its Benefits and Applications
The Whole Shoes Flexing Tester GT-KA01-2 is an advanced footwear testing instrument designed to evaluate the flexing resistance and durability of finished shoes. By simulating repeated walking and bending movements, it helps manufacturers identify cracks, material fatigue, and structural weaknesses in footwear products. Compliant with SATRA TM92, ISO 24266 Method A, and HG/T 2871-2022 Method B, this testing machine provides accurate, repeatable, and reliable results for sports shoes, casual shoes, work shoes, and other footwear types. This guide explores its features, benefits, industry applications, and frequently asked questions to help footwear manufacturers improve product quality and meet international testing requirements.
GESTER International Co., Ltd. gains certificates of ISO 9001, 3A and SGS Audited supplier etc. with advanced design concept, excellent manufacturing technology and strict quality control.
WeChat
Contact us
Tel: +86-595-28886108 
Fax: +86-595-22515221
E-mail: sales10@gester-instruments.com,
                 info@gester-instruments.com
Mobile/Whatapp/ Wechat:  
             + 86(0)18059985379
Address:  No.15, Chifeng Road,Licheng Region, Quanzhou city of Fujian,PR China.
Customer service
detect