loading

PPE Testing Equipment Manufacturer | Safety Equipment Testing Machines | GESTER


Products

Brief Introduction of Textile Burning Performance Testing Technology

There are many flame retardant testing methods. Almost all countries have their own national standards. Different types of fabrics have different testing methods. Some fabrics can also use different testing methods to evaluate their flame retardant performance. Traditionally, it can be divided into vertical method, 45° inclination method, and horizontal method according to the different placement of fabric samples. The most commonly used test methods are now introduced: vertical method, 45° tilt method, horizontal method and limited oxygen index method. 1. Vertical method 1. Principle This test method stipulates that the sample is placed vertically (the length direction of the sample is perpendicular to the horizontal line), the combustion source is below the sample to ignite the sample, and the minimum ignition time and continuous combustion time of the sample are measured , Flame retardant time, flame spread speed, carbonized length (damage length), carbonized area (damaged area) and other indicators related to flame retardant performance, and based on this, the flame retardant performance level of the sample or whether it is qualified. 2. Main test standards (Table 5) Country standard number Standard name Applicable scope Remarks US 16CRFpart1615: 2003 flammability test method for children's pajamas. Suitable for children's pajamas and accessories of different sizes. 16CRFpart1616: 2003 European BSENISO6940 flammability of textile fabrics: determination of the flammability of vertical samples. Suitable for fabrics such as clothing, curtains and curtains, including single-layer or multi-layer fabric components. Burning properties of BSENISO6941 textile fabrics: determination of flame spread of vertical specimens. Japan JISL1091-1999 Test A-4 Method for the Burning Performance of Textiles. Suitable for woven fabrics, knitted fabrics, coated products, laminated products, etc. China GB/T5455-1997 Textile Burning Performance Test: Vertical Method. Suitable for flame-retardant woven fabrics, knitted fabrics, coated products, laminated products, etc. Non-equivalent Japanese method JISL1091. GB/T5456-1997 Textile Burning Performance Vertical Direction—Determination of Flame Spread Performance of Samples. Suitable for single-component or multi-component (coating, quilting, multilayer, sandwich products and similar combinations) clothing, curtains, valances and large tents including awnings and door covers. Equivalently adopts ISO6941A-4 method. 2. 45° Inclination Method 1. Principle This test method stipulates that the sample is placed at an angle of 45° (the length of the sample is at a 45° angle to the horizontal), and the combustion source is on the upper or lower surface below the sample to ignite the sample (Some methods are specified as the upper surface, and some methods are specified as the lower surface), measuring the time required for the sample to burn up a certain distance, or measuring the continuous combustion and flame retardant time after the sample is burned, the flame spread speed, and carbonization Length (damaged length), carbonized area (damaged area), or the number of times the sample needs to be exposed to the flame when it burns to a certain distance from the lower end of the sample, and other indicators related to the flame retardant performance, and based on this, the flame retardant performance level of the sample or Eligibility. 2. Main test standards (Table 6) Country Standard Number Standard Name Applicable Scope Remarks US 16CRFpart1610 Flammability Test Method for Wearing Fabrics. Suitable for clothing products. Japan JISL1091-1999 textile burning performance test. The A1 method is suitable for light and thin textiles. The A2 method is suitable for heavy fabrics. China GB/T14644-1993 Textile Burning Performance Measurement of Burning Rate in 45° Direction. Suitable for clothing textiles. The 16CRFpart1610 test method is the same. GB/T14645-1993 Textile combustion performance 45° direction, damage area and flame number determination. A method of all kinds of textile fabrics. Method B is suitable for melt-burning fabrics. 3. Horizontal method 1. Principle Ignite a horizontally placed sample, measure the spreading distance and time of the flame on the sample, and use the burning rate to characterize the flame retardancy of the fabric. 2. Main test standards (Table 7) Country standard number Standard name Applicable scope Remarks Japanese JISL1091-1999 Textile Burning Performance Test: Method A3. It is suitable for carpets and bedding fabrics and other heavy fabrics. Place the sample horizontally, ignite below the center of the sample, and measure the carbonized area of u200bu200bthe sample. China FZ/T01028-1993 Determination of the Burning Properties of Textile Fabrics: Horizontal Method. Suitable for all kinds of textile fabrics. Place the sample horizontally, ignite at the edge of the sample, and measure the flame spread rate. 4. Limiting oxygen index method (LOI method) 1. Principle Place the sample under the specified test conditions and determine the minimum oxygen concentration required to maintain its continuous combustion in the oxygen-nitrogen mixed gas flow, expressed as a percentage . 2. Main test standards (Table 8) Country standard number Standard name Applicable scope European ISO4589 plastics are tested for their flammability by limiting oxygen index. Suitable for high polymer materials such as rubber, plastic and fiber. Japan's JISK7201 plastic measures its flammability through the limiting oxygen index. China GB/T5454-1997 Textile Burning Performance Test Oxygen Index Method. Suitable for various types of textiles (including single-component or multi-component), such as woven fabrics, knitted fabrics, non-woven fabrics, coated fabrics, laminated fabrics, composite fabrics, carpets, etc. (including flame-retardant treatment and non-woven fabrics) Processed).

GESTER International Co.,Limited is trying to institute social good changes this relationship because it averts a firm's resources from its core task of increasing profits.

Get cost effective and professional tensile tester manufacturers advice for your solution at GESTER Instruments. GESTER International Co.,Limited expert is your first choice!

High-quality products are huge boosts when it comes to marketing ideas; allowing potential manufacturers to place themselves in the shoes of a satisfied customer brings them one step closer to understanding the idea of textile testing equipment.

Our company is professional in manufacturing textile testing equipment especially tensile tester manufacturers.

GET IN TOUCH WITH Us
recommended articles
DIN Abrasion Tester vs Taber Abraser: What Is the Difference?

Choosing the right abrasion testing equipment is essential for obtaining accurate and repeatable wear resistance results. DIN Abrasion Tester and Taber Abrasion Tester are two widely used abrasion testing machines, but they are designed for different material types and testing purposes.

This article provides a detailed comparison between DIN Abrasion Tester and Taber Abraser, covering their working principles, specimen requirements, industry applications, standard compliance, technical characteristics, operation features and practical advantages. DIN Abrasion Tester is mainly designed for rubber, elastic materials, tires, conveyor belts and footwear soles, while Taber Abrasion Tester is suitable for flat materials such as coatings, textiles, plastics, leather, metals and decorative surfaces.

By understanding the differences between these two abrasion testing methods, laboratories can select the most suitable abrasion tester based on sample geometry, testing standards and production quality control requirements.
Top Features of a Certified TDM Cut Resistance Tester Supplier for Laboratory Use
The demand for precise PPE safety testing has surged with the evolution of protective gear, making TDM (Tomodynamometer) cut resistance testing a critical process for evaluating protective gloves and industrial textiles. This article details the top features of a certified TDM cut resistance tester supplier for laboratory use, including compliance with international standards (EN 388, ISO 13997, ASTM F2992), high-precision mechanical engineering, automated workflows, robust data management, and integrated safety features. It highlights GESTER International Co., Ltd.—a 20+ year experienced manufacturer with ISO 9001 certification and partnerships with SGS, Intertek, and TUV—as a leading supplier, offering the GT-KC28 TDM Cut Test Machine and comprehensive services (on-site installation, calibration, global technical support). For laboratories seeking reliable, standard-compliant testing solutions to validate PPE safety claims, this article provides actionable insights into strategic procurement. Visit https://www.gesterinstruments.com/ for more technical specifications and PPE testing solutions.
Cobb Test Paper Absorption Tester GT-N07 - A Comprehensive Guide
The Cobb Test Paper Absorption Tester GT-N07 is an essential instrument for evaluating the water absorption properties of paper and paperboard materials. This test, commonly known as the Cobb method, helps determine how much water paper can absorb over a specified time under controlled conditions—crucial for assessing its suitability in printing, packaging, and coating applications.
Why GESTER Ranks as a Leading TPP Thermal Protective Performance Tester Exporter
As a trusted leading TPP Thermal Protective Performance Tester exporter, GESTER International Co., Ltd. brings 25+ years of R&D and manufacturing expertise to PPE safety testing. Our flagship GT-RC02 series TPP testers feature advanced dual-source thermal simulation, high-sensitivity sensors, and full digital automation—delivering precise, repeatable data to evaluate thermal protection for firefighter and industrial protective clothing. Fully compliant with global standards (NFPA 1971, EN 469, ISO), GESTER’s equipment is trusted by SGS, Intertek, and top testing institutes worldwide. Backed by ISO 9001 certification, global service in 160+ countries, and professional calibration support, we empower manufacturers and labs to meet stringent safety regulations and ensure life-saving thermal protection. Discover tailored TPP testing solutions for PPE excellence at GESTER.
What is EN 149 & Why is it Important?
EN 149 is the core European standard for particle-filtering half masks and FFP respirators. This article elaborates on the definition, structure, performance classification, marking rules and core advantages of EN 149, compares it with NIOSH N95, KN95, EN 143 and medical mask standards, and lists industry application scenarios, as well as professional mask and filter testing instruments compliant with EN 149 testing requirements.
Strengthening Safety Standards: The Role of a PPE Testing Equipment Supplier at A+A
The A+A Trade Fair in Düsseldorf (2026) highlights tightening global PPE safety regulations, shifting the industry from basic compliance to comprehensive performance verification. As international standards (ISO, EN, ASTM) become more granular, professional PPE testing equipment suppliers like GESTER play a pivotal role in bridging theoretical standards and practical implementation. GESTER’s high-precision, multi-standard testing tools (covering cut resistance, thermal protection, liquid penetration, etc.), backed by ISO 9001 certification and partnerships with SGS/TUV, ensure data traceability, reliability, and compliance. With 20+ years of expertise, modular innovation, and holistic service (calibration, training), the supplier supports manufacturers and laboratories in meeting stringent safety benchmarks, enabling global market entry and safeguarding worker lives. Strategic procurement of such future-ready equipment is key to long-term occupational safety success.
ISO 20345 vs ASTM F2413: Differences Between Safety Footwear Standards
ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413 are the two most recognized safety footwear standards used worldwide to evaluate protective footwear performance. Although both standards define minimum requirements for impact resistance and compression protection, differences in test energy levels, compression loads, marking systems, and hazard classifications can affect certification results. This article explains the key differences between ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413, helping footwear manufacturers, exporters, and quality control teams select the correct testing standard and improve compliance with international safety requirements.
 Fabric Pilling Test: How to Choose the Right ICI Pilling Box Tester GT-C18
Fabric pilling directly affects the appearance, durability, and perceived quality of textile products. With global textile brands enforcing stricter testing standards, reliable laboratory testing equipment has become essential for manufacturers. This article explores how fabric pilling tests are conducted and why textile laboratories increasingly invest in professional ICI pilling box testers such as the GT-C18. It explains the advantages of in-house testing, international compliance requirements, key machine components, and important parameters buyers should evaluate before purchasing a pilling tester. By selecting the right equipment, textile companies can achieve faster quality verification, reduce dependence on third-party laboratories, and ensure their fabrics consistently meet international market standards.
ISO 20344 Tester – Tested by ISO 20344 Standard
EN ISO 20344 is the core international test method standard for full-performance detection of safety footwear. This article systematically explains the full range of whole-shoe test items covered by the ISO 20344 standard, analyzes the core practical advantages of mandatory ISO 20344 testing for factories and laboratories, and matches a complete set of dedicated ISO 20344 testers one by one. It also sorts out mainstream associated safety footwear standards worldwide, providing one-stop standardized testing solutions for safety footwear manufacturers, third-party testing institutions and occupational safety supervision departments.
How to Find a Professional Safety Glove Testing Machine Manufacturer with CE Certification?
With the global PPE market’s rapid growth, choosing a professional CE-certified safety glove testing machine manufacturer is critical for data integrity and international compliance. This article explains why CE certification is non-negotiable (ensuring EU safety/quality standards), outlines essential test items (abrasion, cut, thermal protection per EN 388/EN 407), highlights core instruments (GESTER GT-KC28 TDM Cut Tester, GT-KC29 Cutting Tester, GT-C101 Heat Contact Machine), and details how to evaluate suppliers (20+ years of experience, partnerships with SGS/Bureau Veritas, ISO 9001 certification, after-sales support). It also covers the benefits of OEM/ODM capabilities for customized solutions. Ultimately, partnering with trusted manufacturers like GESTER ensures high-precision, compliant testing to protect workers and meet global market requirements.
GESTER International Co., Ltd. gains certificates of ISO 9001, 3A and SGS Audited supplier etc. with advanced design concept, excellent manufacturing technology and strict quality control.
WeChat
Contact us
Tel: +86-595-28886108 
Fax: +86-595-22515221
E-mail: sales10@gester-instruments.com,
                 info@gester-instruments.com
Mobile/Whatapp/ Wechat:  
             + 86(0)18059985379
Address:  No.15, Chifeng Road,Licheng Region, Quanzhou city of Fujian,PR China.
Customer service
detect