loading

PPE Testing Equipment Manufacturer | Safety Equipment Testing Machines | GESTER


Products

Research on the Test of Moisture Permeability of Medical Protective Clothing

Human body heat is emitted by radiation, conduction, convection and evaporation pathways in a static state, and the amount of perspiration per day is 700 ~ I 200 per adult; when goods are transported outdoors at 32 35 ℃, they will emit 200 ~ 2 per day. 000 perspiration, this is the sense of sweating. About 87.5% of the human body’s heat is discharged through the skin. Therefore, the clothing with the largest skin contact area plays a vital role in the heat dissipation of the human body. If the moisture permeability of the clothing is 500 g/( m2 · 24) above, it can maintain the comfort of wearing I-medical protective clothing is a special functional clothing. The most basic condition for clothing is to meet the physiological needs of people. If this condition is not met, the functional Fortunately, during the SARS period, the medical staff in the isolation area wore multi-layer protective clothing and performed various operations with the air conditioner turned off. As a result, some medical staff suffered from chest tightness, shortness of breath, and a lot of sweating, leading to collapse and fainting. Most protective products have poor moisture permeability and wearing comfort, so moisture permeability has become the focus of attention and research focus. This article will focus on the research and analysis of medical protective clothing fabric structure, moisture permeability and related test standards. 1 Fabric moisture permeability test 1.1 Test method The standard test method for fabric moisture permeability is generally the test of the fabric water vapor transmission rate and the test of the evaporation heat transfer resistance. Two major researchers commonly use water vapor resistance to evaluate human sweat from the surface of the body through the fabric to the environment. The transfer ability should include the sweating hot plate method and the sweating dummy method, and the fabric and clothing manufacturers tend to use the vapor-permeable cup method, that is, under a fixed temperature, a certain humidity and a fixed wind speed, the fabric will pass through the fabric in a unit of time. The water vapor per unit area, which is the more familiar moisture permeability, is used to evaluate the moisture permeability of the fabric. 1.2 The test standard moisture permeability is an index closely related to the wearing comfort of protective equipment]. The moisture vapor permeability test methods often used in medical protective equipment in the world mainly include the American standard ASTM E96, the Japanese standard JIS 1099, the international standard ISO 2528, the British standard BS3424 and the Chinese national standard GB/T 12704 1991. They all have the same standards. The test conditions, therefore, the test value is sometimes very large. It can be seen through comparison. Although all countries use the same standard to test the temperature permeability of fabrics, the applicable objects of the national standards are different. The ASTM standard is the most widely applicable and can be used for any sheet. Because of the wide range of test conditions, sample size ranges and test time intervals, ASTM standards require that the selected standard test conditions and the use environment of the material are close to the relative humidity specified by the B method in the Chinese standard. It is difficult to control during testing. Moreover, it does not conform to the actual use conditions of the fabric. The Japanese standard is equivalent to the scope of the Chinese standard. They are all textile products, so the test method is very close, but there is no inverted cup method in the test method in China. 2 Experimental part 2.1 Materials In order to have an understanding of the moisture permeability of protective clothing fabrics, a protective polytetrafluoroethylene (PfFE) laminated fabric was developed, and other types of medical protective clothing fabric laminated fabrics can be collected according to the end use Need to adopt different design structures and composite layers. The sample specifications are shown in the table. The fabric is a developed polytetrafluoroethylene (PfFE) multifunctional protective clothing fabric, and the material is a layer composite sample, although the hand feels slightly hard , But it can improve abrasion resistance;'The fabric is polyurethane (PU) coated fabric; the emblem and fabric are thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU coated non-woven fabrics) with different areal densities, and the areal density is 50 83 g/m2. ; 10 The fabric is a disposable protective high-density polyethylene non-woven fabric. These medical protective clothing non-oily particles (NaCl granular gel (075 µm)) generally have a rapid efficiency above 95 (GB/T 2-2003) The requirement is not less than 70. 2.2 Instruments and methods Test instruments: KYKY-28008 scanning electron microscope; LFY-216A moisture meter; JD400-3 electronic balance (precision 0.001 method: moisture permeability comparison test and moisture permeability test under multi-layer wear GB/ T 12704-91 method-desiccant method (positive cup) and GB/T 12704-91 method-evaporation method (positive cup) test method and refer to the American standard ASTM E96 and Japanese standard JIS. 'Test conditions (temperature) (38 ±) ℃ relative humidity 50 ± 2)% moisture permeability calculation formula: WVT u003d 24 ml A? T where WVT is the moisture permeability per square meter per day (g/( ~ 2 ·24 h)); The common name is the same experimental combination (g); the experimental time (h); the actual experimental area (open) each time the test sample is not less than one piece, the relative error is less than 10%.

It is beyond doubt that benefits tensile tester manufacturers. Market sentiments are strong, especially in the light of growing tensile tester manufacturers observed globally.

GESTER International Co.,Limited will become the destination store for customers, offering the convenience of multiple brands and channels, and providing a personal high touch shopping experience that helps create lifelong customer relationships.

The above are only part of the examples regarding textile testing equipment, for more information, please click here GESTER Instruments.

GESTER International Co.,Limited’s model also predicts (i) a positive effect of management on firm performance; (ii) a positive relationship between product market competition and average management quality (part of which stems from the larger covariance between management with firm size as competition strengthens); and (iii) a rise (fall) in the level (dispersion) of management with firm age.

GET IN TOUCH WITH Us
recommended articles
PPE Trends: Insights from a China Top PPE Testing Machine Company
As 2026 approaches, the global PPE industry is transformed by stricter industrial safety regulations, healthcare awareness, and evolving international standards (ISO/ASTM/EN). Key trends include the rise of Smart PPE, adoption of sustainable bio-based materials, and converging global compliance requirements—demanding high-precision, automated testing equipment with data traceability. GESTER International Co., Ltd., a China top PPE testing machine company with 25+ years of expertise, addresses these challenges through modular, standards-aligned solutions (e.g., TPP Thermal Protection Tester GT-RC02A, TDM Cut Test Machine GT-KC28) and long-term partnerships with SGS, TUV, and Intertek. Offering global technical support (installation, calibration, training) and automated, multi-standard-compatible equipment, GESTER empowers PPE manufacturers to meet 2026’s rigorous safety benchmarks. This article explores PPE performance evolution, 2026 industry trends, technological testing responses, and strategic procurement tips—emphasizing how China’s leading testing machine providers bridge hardware innovation with global compliance to protect human life. For professional PPE testing solutions, visit https://www.gesterinstruments.com/.
ISO 20345 vs ASTM F2413: Differences Between Safety Footwear Standards
ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413 are the two most recognized safety footwear standards used worldwide to evaluate protective footwear performance. Although both standards define minimum requirements for impact resistance and compression protection, differences in test energy levels, compression loads, marking systems, and hazard classifications can affect certification results. This article explains the key differences between ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413, helping footwear manufacturers, exporters, and quality control teams select the correct testing standard and improve compliance with international safety requirements.
What is Air Permeability Tester? Detailed Overview and Benefits

The air permeability tester is a high-precision testing instrument designed to evaluate the breathability of PPE materials, textile fabrics, non-woven fabrics, woven fabrics, and industrial filter media. It plays a critical role in quality control, product development, and laboratory research across multiple industries including PPE, textiles, automotive interiors, and filtration systems.

Modern instruments such as the GT-C27 Air Permeability Tester are developed with advanced sensor systems, automated control logic, and multi-standard compatibility to ensure reliable and repeatable results. Complying with global standards such as ISO 9237, ASTM D737, DIN 53887, and GB/T 5453, it guarantees internationally recognized testing performance.

With high automation, accurate pressure sensing, and flexible unit conversion systems, air permeability testing equipment significantly improves testing efficiency while reducing human error. It is widely used in PPE manufacturing, textile engineering, non-woven product development, and industrial filtration quality inspection.
What is EN 149 & Why is it Important?
EN 149 is the core European standard for particle-filtering half masks and FFP respirators. This article elaborates on the definition, structure, performance classification, marking rules and core advantages of EN 149, compares it with NIOSH N95, KN95, EN 143 and medical mask standards, and lists industry application scenarios, as well as professional mask and filter testing instruments compliant with EN 149 testing requirements.
Why GESTER is Recognized as a Global Top Safety Shoe Tester Exporter
As global industrial safety requirements tighten, GESTER International Co., Ltd has emerged as a globally recognized top safety shoe tester exporter, serving 168 countries with over 25 years of specialized expertise. The company’s success hinges on its commitment to precision engineering, compliance with international standards (ISO, ASTM, EN, SATRA), and partnerships with renowned testing institutes like SGS, Intertek, and TUV. Its product lineup, including the Safety Glove & Shoe Upper Cutting Tester GT-KC29 and cut resistance testers, delivers reliable, repeatable data for safety footwear durability, cut resistance, and other critical performance indicators. Complemented by a comprehensive global service network (on-site installation, calibration, staff training) and OEM/ODM customization capabilities, GESTER streamlines quality control for manufacturers, facilitating market access and ensuring workplace safety. Trusted by PPE brands and laboratories worldwide, GESTER bridges technical excellence and practical usability to drive efficiency in safety shoe certification and global trade.
DIN Abrasion Tester vs Taber Abraser: What Is the Difference?

Choosing the right abrasion testing equipment is essential for obtaining accurate and repeatable wear resistance results. DIN Abrasion Tester and Taber Abrasion Tester are two widely used abrasion testing machines, but they are designed for different material types and testing purposes.

This article provides a detailed comparison between DIN Abrasion Tester and Taber Abraser, covering their working principles, specimen requirements, industry applications, standard compliance, technical characteristics, operation features and practical advantages. DIN Abrasion Tester is mainly designed for rubber, elastic materials, tires, conveyor belts and footwear soles, while Taber Abrasion Tester is suitable for flat materials such as coatings, textiles, plastics, leather, metals and decorative surfaces.

By understanding the differences between these two abrasion testing methods, laboratories can select the most suitable abrasion tester based on sample geometry, testing standards and production quality control requirements.
What is the Safety Glove & Shoe Upper Cutting Tester GT-KC29
The Safety Glove & Shoe Upper Cutting Tester GT-KC29 is a high-precision testing instrument developed to measure the cut resistance performance of safety gloves and footwear uppers. In industrial and construction environments where sharp tools and metal edges pose significant injury risks, the GT-KC29 provides a reliable evaluation method by simulating real cutting motion. This tester meets EN 388 section 6.2, ISO 20344:2021 section 5.23, GB/T 20991 section 6.14, and other global standards, making it essential for PPE manufacturers, testing laboratories, and quality control departments. With automated operation, high repeatability, and multi-standard compliance, it helps companies improve product safety levels, enhance global competitiveness, and ensure superior protection for end users.
PPE Testing Equipment: Complete Guide to Personal Protective Equipment Testing
PPE Testing Equipment is used to evaluate the safety, durability, and protective performance of personal protective equipment under controlled test conditions. This complete guide covers five major PPE testing categories: Safety Footwear Testing Equipment, Glove Testing Equipment, Protective Clothing Testing Equipment, Mask Testing Equipment, and Safety Helmet Testing Equipment. Learn about common PPE test methods, applicable standards, equipment types, laboratory requirements, and key factors to consider when selecting PPE Test Equipment for quality control, product development, certification, and laboratory applications.
How to Choose a PPE Testing Equipment Manufacturer: 10 Things to Check
Choosing the right PPE testing equipment manufacturer is an important decision for PPE manufacturers, testing laboratories, certification bodies, research institutions, and quality inspection organizations. The right supplier should provide more than individual testing machines—it should offer standards-compliant equipment, reliable measurement performance, calibration support, technical expertise, customization, and long-term service. This guide explains 10 essential factors to check before selecting a PPE testing equipment manufacturer.
Safety Footwear Test Explained: Compression and Puncture Tester
This article fully explains the working principle, applicable international standards, test advantages and application scope of safety footwear compression and puncture tester GT-KB12A. It covers core protective performance testing of safety shoe toecap and sole steel plate, complies with GB, ISO, EN, ASTM and other global standards, and serves manufacturers, third-party labs and safety footwear R&D institutions for quality control .
GESTER International Co., Ltd. gains certificates of ISO 9001, 3A and SGS Audited supplier etc. with advanced design concept, excellent manufacturing technology and strict quality control.
WeChat
Contact us
Tel: +86-595-28886108 
Fax: +86-595-22515221
E-mail: sales10@gester-instruments.com,
                 info@gester-instruments.com
Mobile/Whatapp/ Wechat:  
             + 86(0)18059985379
Address:  No.15, Chifeng Road,Licheng Region, Quanzhou city of Fujian,PR China.
Customer service
detect