loading

PPE Testing Equipment Manufacturer | Safety Equipment Testing Machines | GESTER


Products

The purchase management of scientific research instruments and reagents in my country needs to be improved

With the development of science and technology, the demand for scientific research equipment and reagents is increasing. According to the survey, many laboratories are very scarce, especially in universities in the central and western regions, where cutting-edge scientific research project data can only be obtained outside for testing. University laboratories are not equipped with large-scale testing instruments, let alone scientific research reagents. Purchase, lack of scientific research equipment is one of the important reasons restricting their development.   This year's government work report puts forward that it is necessary to fully respect and trust scientific research personnel, and give innovative teams and leading talents greater control over people, property, and technical routes. Lu Youming, a member of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, dean of the School of Basic Medicine of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, and deputy dean of Tongji Medical College, believes that my country’s Ru0026D expenditure is second only to the United States, and the Ru0026D expenditure intensity reaches 2.12%, but the level of scientific research management, especially scientific research There are still many shortcomings in the instrument and reagent purchase system, which need to be supplemented urgently.   Committee member Lu Youming pointed out that my country currently has many shortcomings in the purchase of scientific research instruments and reagents:    First, the management authority of scientific research funds is scattered.   The funding channels used by universities to purchase scientific research equipment mainly include self-raised funds, national special projects, and various funds. Project funds from different sources are managed and distributed by different departments, and schools cannot make overall plans, which makes it more difficult to make a scientific and reasonable procurement plan.   The second is that the funding cycle is long and the time for use is short. So far, a total of 56 universities in mainland China have won bids for scientific research equipment and equipment, and the cumulative amount has reached a staggering 198.3 million yuan. Among them, the largest purchasers are mainly double-class universities in Hebei, Anhui, and Shandong. Only Hebei University is one university. It reached the purchase amount of 26.18 million yuan. So far, the total amount of winning bids for scientific research instrument projects in double first-class universities has reached more than 700 million yuan, and the number of winning bids has exceeded 250. These large-scale scientific research equipment purchases are mainly due to the corresponding policies and supporting measures issued by various provinces to support the talent training, equipment purchase and infrastructure transformation of various universities. Judging from the annual purchasing list of scientific research instruments of scientific research institutions in universities, spectrometers, microscopes, centrifuges, PCR machines, and incubators rank among the top 5 in the purchasing demand list of universities; among them, there are various types of biological microscopes, laser scanning confocal microscopes, etc. The demand for microscopes is increasing. Among various spectroscopic instruments such as Raman, Fourier transform infrared, and atomic fluorescence, the purchase demand for UV-Vis spectrophotometers is far ahead. It seems that the demand for scientific research instruments and equipment in universities is not small.  The annual scientific research funding is allocated in September each year, and the implementation must be completed in December of the same year. The user cannot complete the procurement work of complex procedures such as formulating procurement plans, preparing procurement budgets, purchasing demonstrations, writing technical tenders, bidding procurement, and signing contracts. At the same time, relevant departments require that a list of scientific research instruments purchased for the next year of more than 2 million yuan be reported every year. This easily led to the failure to purchase scientific research instruments that were urgently needed. The backward management system has caused serious wastes such as the inability to use money, the lack of money to buy equipment, and the unavailability of scientific research funds.   The third is that imported scientific research reagents take a long time to purchase, are of poor quality and are expensive. At present, more than 85% of scientific research reagents used in universities and scientific research institutes rely on imports. The imported scientific research reagents purchased are mainly from nearly 480 reagent companies of different sizes throughout the country. The procurement time period is too long, generally exceeding 45 days. General scientific research reagents need to be used within a week, which cannot meet the needs of scientific research. Many intermediary companies lack the ability to transport reagents for scientific research, resulting in damage to the reagents during the transportation process. At the same time, the average price of imported reagents has increased by more than twice the average export price of foreign manufacturers, which seriously wastes scientific research funds.   In order to improve the purchase and management of scientific research instruments and reagents, member Lu Youming made suggestions. The first is to coordinate management and establish an internal control system. The finance department and the education department coordinate the overall management of the use of scientific research funds, optimize the allocation of resources, and improve the efficiency of fund use. The administrative management department establishes a sense of service and establishes internal control systems, such as the 'one-off notification system' and 'time-limited settlement system.' The second is to extend the time limit for using funds. Relevant departments should cancel the management system that reports every year the list of scientific research instruments purchased over 2 million yuan in the next year. The budget has been prepared in the early stage, and the ongoing procurement work should reserve a quota of financial funds and extend the use time limit to ensure that the purchased equipment can be paid normally. Third, for the import of scientific research reagents by universities and colleges, consideration can be given to policies such as speeding up customs clearance and tax reduction and exemption.

is emerging as one of the most popular textile testing equipment, moving beyond its tensile tester manufacturers benefits, with conclusive scientific evidence suggesting the positive role play in tensile tester manufacturers.

GESTER International Co.,Limited’s mission is to use our extensive textile testing equipment experience to deliver tangible business results enabling our clients in industry and government to profit from the advanced use of technology. We strive to build long-term client relationships based on mutual trust and respect.

GESTER International Co.,Limited usees sentiment analysis to understand what their customers care about and leverage that information to reposition their products, create new content or even provide new products and services.

To offer abundant options of product is an important factor to a company, such as textile testing equipmenttensile tester manufacturers to afford high-quality products for customers.

But we do think that reckoning with supply chains of textile testing equipment is a really important step. Even super simple switches in material, or sourcing, or shipping, or worker benefits seems like good place to start.

GET IN TOUCH WITH Us
recommended articles
Bally Resistance Flexing Tester – An Effective Method for Testing Material Flexing
The Bally Resistance Flexing Tester, also known as the Bally Leather Flexometer, is an essential testing instrument for evaluating the flex durability of leather, coated fabrics, synthetic leather, and textile materials. By accurately simulating repeated bending conditions encountered during actual use, the tester helps manufacturers assess material performance, prevent premature product failures, and meet international quality standards. This article explores the working principle, key benefits, applicable testing standards, and common specimen materials suitable for Bally flexing resistance testing.
What is EN 149 & Why is it Important?
EN 149 is the core European standard for particle-filtering half masks and FFP respirators. This article elaborates on the definition, structure, performance classification, marking rules and core advantages of EN 149, compares it with NIOSH N95, KN95, EN 143 and medical mask standards, and lists industry application scenarios, as well as professional mask and filter testing instruments compliant with EN 149 testing requirements.
Technical Insight: How a Professional EN388 Gloves Tester Company Evaluates Durability
In industrial settings, protective gloves’ durability is critical for workplace safety, with the EN388 standard serving as the global benchmark for evaluating abrasion, cut, tear, and puncture resistance. GESTER International Co., Ltd., a professional EN388 gloves tester company with over 20 years of experience, delivers high-precision testing solutions to ensure accurate and reliable durability assessments. Equipped with advanced instruments like the Safety Glove & Shoe Upper Cutting Tester GT-KC29—featuring LCD display, real-time monitoring, and compliance with EN, ISO, and ASTM standards—GESTER’s solutions meet the rigorous demands of laboratories, manufacturers, and international testing institutes such as SGS, TUV, and Intertek. Adhering to ISO 9001 quality management systems and offering comprehensive after-sales support (installation, training, calibration), GESTER empowers clients to validate PPE performance, mitigate workplace risks, and achieve global regulatory compliance. For trusted EN388 gloves durability testing equipment and integrated laboratory solutions, GESTER is the preferred partner in the PPE industry.
PPE Testing Laboratory Equipment List
Setting up a PPE testing laboratory requires the right combination of instruments for safety footwear, gloves, protective clothing, masks and safety helmets. This guide explains the core testing equipment used in modern PPE laboratories, the standards they support, and the functions of each instrument, helping manufacturers, third-party laboratories and certification bodies choose a reliable and compliant testing setup.
How to Choose the Right DIN Abrasion Tester
This article provides a comprehensive guide to selecting the right DIN Abrasion Tester for material wear performance evaluation. It covers the instrument's function, applicable standards (including ISO 20344, DIN-53516, ISO 4649, ASTM D5963), key features like digital counter and auto-stop, application scope for rubber, tires, shoe soles, and conveyor belts, as well as quality, construction, brand considerations, and FAQs on troubleshooting. Ideal for laboratories, quality inspection departments, and material research institutions.
PPE Trends: Insights from a China Top PPE Testing Machine Company
As 2026 approaches, the global PPE industry is transformed by stricter industrial safety regulations, healthcare awareness, and evolving international standards (ISO/ASTM/EN). Key trends include the rise of Smart PPE, adoption of sustainable bio-based materials, and converging global compliance requirements—demanding high-precision, automated testing equipment with data traceability. GESTER International Co., Ltd., a China top PPE testing machine company with 25+ years of expertise, addresses these challenges through modular, standards-aligned solutions (e.g., TPP Thermal Protection Tester GT-RC02A, TDM Cut Test Machine GT-KC28) and long-term partnerships with SGS, TUV, and Intertek. Offering global technical support (installation, calibration, training) and automated, multi-standard-compatible equipment, GESTER empowers PPE manufacturers to meet 2026’s rigorous safety benchmarks. This article explores PPE performance evolution, 2026 industry trends, technological testing responses, and strategic procurement tips—emphasizing how China’s leading testing machine providers bridge hardware innovation with global compliance to protect human life. For professional PPE testing solutions, visit https://www.gesterinstruments.com/.
Heat Contact Machine GT-C101-The Ultimate Selection Guide

The Heat Contact Machine GT-C101 is a specialized testing instrument designed for evaluating the heat resistance and thermal protective performance of gloves, protective clothing, and other heat-resistant materials used in high-temperature environments. In industries such as smelting, casting, welding, and glass manufacturing, workers are frequently exposed to intense heat, making accurate testing of contact heat resistance essential for ensuring safety and compliance.

GT-C101 simulates real working conditions by measuring heat transfer delay and thermal transmission under instant contact with high-temperature surfaces. Fully compliant with EN 407, EN 702, and ISO 12127-1 standards, this machine provides precise, repeatable data for manufacturers, laboratories, and research institutions. With high-temperature capability up to 500°C, advanced calorimetry, digital monitoring, and adjustable contact speed, the Heat Contact Machine GT-C101 is an indispensable tool for developing and certifying next-generation PPE and heat-insulation materials.
What is the Safety Footwear Impact Tester & Why are They Important in Safety Shoes Testing
A Safety Footwear Impact Tester evaluates the impact resistance of safety shoes by striking the steel toe cap with 100J/200J kinetic energy, ensuring compliance with global standards (EN ISO 20344, ASTM F2412). It’s critical for verifying product protection, facilitating certification, and optimizing safety shoe design. GESTER Instruments offers reliable, user-friendly testers trusted by manufacturers and labs worldwide.
ISO 20345 vs ASTM F2413: Differences Between Safety Footwear Standards
ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413 are the two most recognized safety footwear standards used worldwide to evaluate protective footwear performance. Although both standards define minimum requirements for impact resistance and compression protection, differences in test energy levels, compression loads, marking systems, and hazard classifications can affect certification results. This article explains the key differences between ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413, helping footwear manufacturers, exporters, and quality control teams select the correct testing standard and improve compliance with international safety requirements.
Analysis of Pilling Influencing Factors and Testing Methods
Pilling testing plays a vital role in textile quality control, helping manufacturers evaluate and improve the wear performance of fabrics. Through the use of advanced instruments like ICI Pilling Box Test Method (GT-C18) , Martindale Abrasion Test Method (GT-C13B) , and Random Tumble Pilling Test Method (GT-C19A) , laboratories can conduct precise and standardized assessments, ensuring that final textile products deliver superior appearance, comfort, and longevity.
GESTER International Co., Ltd. gains certificates of ISO 9001, 3A and SGS Audited supplier etc. with advanced design concept, excellent manufacturing technology and strict quality control.
WeChat
Contact us
Tel: +86-595-28886108 
Fax: +86-595-22515221
E-mail: sales10@gester-instruments.com,
                 info@gester-instruments.com
Mobile/Whatapp/ Wechat:  
             + 86(0)18059985379
Address:  No.15, Chifeng Road,Licheng Region, Quanzhou city of Fujian,PR China.
Customer service
detect