loading

PPE Testing Equipment Manufacturer | Safety Equipment Testing Machines | GESTER


Products

Classification and comparison of test methods for down resistance of fabrics

Feather down is a natural material with irreplaceable advantages over other materials. Down products are favored by consumers for their light, soft and warm properties. However, the drilling down problem of down products has always plagued manufacturers and consumers, and it is also one of the hot spots of quality complaints of down products. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to study the test method of fabric anti-drilling down performance for improving the quality of down products and reducing the quality disputes caused by down and down drilling. 1 Feather and down drilling mechanism The anti-drilling performance refers to the performance of the fabric to prevent the feather and down from being drilled out of its surface, which is expressed by the number of down-drilling roots under the action of the specified conditions. Down fibers exist in the form of tufts. In each tuft, there are several fibers with basically the same internal structure. Each fiber will have a certain repulsion force and keep the distance to the maximum, so that the down is produced. fluffy. When the down quilt is filled into the product, the down close to the fabric is repulsed by the inner down and squeezed outward, producing an outward pushing force to make the down close to the fabric. Down has good resilience, no matter which direction is pressed, the fibers can quickly return to their original shape, while the air permeability of down-proof fabrics is usually poor, resulting in the stagnation of a large amount of still air in the down-filled inner cavity of down products. When the down product is squeezed or rubbed by the outside world, the still air leaks out from the pores of the fabric or the needle eye of the suture, and the down takes the opportunity to follow the air to drill out of the inner cavity, forming drill down[1]—2]. 2 Classification of anti-drilling down test methods Research on fabric anti-drilling down test methods has always been a bottleneck restricting the development of down products. In my country's down clothing product standards, there is no specific requirement for the anti-drilling down property index. Scientific and effective test methods and test equipment have a great impact on the research on down resistance properties of down products. According to the test principle and test equipment, the current test methods for the anti-drilling performance of fabrics at home and abroad can be divided into three categories [3]: transfer box method: according to GB/T 12705.2—2009 'Test methods for down resistance of textile fabrics - Part 2: Transfer box method', FTMS191A Method 5530—1978 Test method of test method for down resistance of fabrics by transfer box method. Friction method: according to GB /T 12705.1—2009 'Test methods for down resistance of textile fabrics - Part 1: Friction method', EN12132.1—1998 'Feather and down fabrics - Test methods for down resistance - Part 1: Friction test' test. Shock method: according to EN 12132.2—1998 'Test methods for down resistance of feather and down fabrics - Part 2: Impact test' test. 2.1 The transfer box method The transfer box method was originally derived from the standard FTMS 191A Method 5530 formulated by the US federal government in 1978.—1978 'Test method for anti-drilling down of fabrics - transfer box method', in 1991, my country also formulated GB/T 12705 with reference to the American standard—1991 'Test method for down resistance of fabrics', and updated in 2009 to GB/T 12705.2—2009 'Test methods for down resistance of textile fabrics - Part 2: Transfer box method'. The basic principle of the rotating box method is: the sample is made into a sample bag with a certain size, filled with a certain quality of down and feather filling material, placed in the rotating box of the test instrument equipped with hard rubber balls, and passed through the rotating box. It rotates at a constant speed, brings the rubber ball to a certain height, and impacts the sample in the box to simulate the various squeezing, rubbing, and collision effects of down products during consumption. The number of out down and feathers was used to evaluate the anti-drilling performance of the fabric. The rotating box method instrument is shown in Figure 1. There are some differences in the test technology between the two test methods of the transfer box method, and the similarities and differences are shown in Table 1. It can be seen from Table 1 that the two test methods are all using the revolving box method. The samples are randomly turned over in the revolving box and are impacted by rubber balls to simulate the random state of down products when they are worn. The differences lie in the size of the sample, the quantity and quality of the rubber balls, the speed of the rotary box, the control of the test time, and the evaluation of the test results. For the evaluation of test results, GB/T 12705.2—2009 'Textile fabrics - Test method for down resistance - Part 2: Rotation box method' adopts the statistical method of down down

If you are looking to get started with textile testing equipment, it's important to find a quified . Let GESTER International Co.,Limited be your provider. Visit us at GESTER Instruments.

GESTER International Co.,Limited assures you that you will be satisfied with its results and humbly request you to try this. We are hoping for a better business deal with you.

A technology team created for insuring that textile testing equipment is produced with the finest materials and technologies.

GESTER International Co.,Limited deems textile testing equipment as evolutionary rather than revolutionary. We've always had these 'social commerce' marketplaces in some form.

GET IN TOUCH WITH Us
recommended articles
Why Is Shoe Slip Resistance Tester Important for Footwear Safety?
Slip resistance is one of the most critical performance indicators for modern footwear, especially safety shoes used in industrial and high-risk working environments. Slip and fall accidents frequently occur on wet or smooth surfaces, posing serious risks to workers and consumers. To prevent such accidents and improve product safety, footwear manufacturers widely use professional testing equipment such as Shoe Slip Resistance Tester and Footwear Slip Testing Machine. These devices simulate real walking conditions to measure the coefficient of friction between the shoe sole and various surfaces. This article explores the working principle, features, applications, and industry significance of shoe slip safety tester, explaining why accurate slip resistance testing is essential for footwear safety, product development, quality control, and compliance with international standards.
 Fabric Pilling Test: How to Choose the Right ICI Pilling Box Tester GT-C18
Fabric pilling directly affects the appearance, durability, and perceived quality of textile products. With global textile brands enforcing stricter testing standards, reliable laboratory testing equipment has become essential for manufacturers. This article explores how fabric pilling tests are conducted and why textile laboratories increasingly invest in professional ICI pilling box testers such as the GT-C18. It explains the advantages of in-house testing, international compliance requirements, key machine components, and important parameters buyers should evaluate before purchasing a pilling tester. By selecting the right equipment, textile companies can achieve faster quality verification, reduce dependence on third-party laboratories, and ensure their fabrics consistently meet international market standards.
ISO 20345 vs ASTM F2413: Differences Between Safety Footwear Standards
ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413 are the two most recognized safety footwear standards used worldwide to evaluate protective footwear performance. Although both standards define minimum requirements for impact resistance and compression protection, differences in test energy levels, compression loads, marking systems, and hazard classifications can affect certification results. This article explains the key differences between ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413, helping footwear manufacturers, exporters, and quality control teams select the correct testing standard and improve compliance with international safety requirements.
How to Choose the Right DIN Abrasion Tester
This article provides a comprehensive guide to selecting the right DIN Abrasion Tester for material wear performance evaluation. It covers the instrument's function, applicable standards (including ISO 20344, DIN-53516, ISO 4649, ASTM D5963), key features like digital counter and auto-stop, application scope for rubber, tires, shoe soles, and conveyor belts, as well as quality, construction, brand considerations, and FAQs on troubleshooting. Ideal for laboratories, quality inspection departments, and material research institutions.
Looking for a Laboratory Protective Clothing Tester Supplier? Key Criteria to Consider
As global demand for high-performance PPE surges, selecting a qualified laboratory protective clothing tester supplier becomes critical for manufacturers and regulators. This article outlines core selection criteria: compliance with international standards (ISO, EN, ASTM), comprehensive protective gear tests (particle resistance, fluid barrier, thermal resistance, electrostatic safety), manufacturer qualifications (ISO 9001 certification, partnerships with SGS/TUV/Intertek), equipment precision (automation, modular design, data traceability), and end-to-end service (global support, calibration, customization). With 25+ years of experience, GESTER International delivers standards-aligned, high-precision testing instruments and integrated laboratory solutions, ensuring PPE meets rigorous safety requirements for medical, industrial, and chemical sectors. Explore how to choose a partner that safeguards worker safety through reliable testing.
Safety Footwear Test Explained: Compression and Puncture Tester
This article fully explains the working principle, applicable international standards, test advantages and application scope of safety footwear compression and puncture tester GT-KB12A. It covers core protective performance testing of safety shoe toecap and sole steel plate, complies with GB, ISO, EN, ASTM and other global standards, and serves manufacturers, third-party labs and safety footwear R&D institutions for quality control .
DIN Abrasion Tester vs Taber Abraser: What Is the Difference?

Choosing the right abrasion testing equipment is essential for obtaining accurate and repeatable wear resistance results. DIN Abrasion Tester and Taber Abrasion Tester are two widely used abrasion testing machines, but they are designed for different material types and testing purposes.

This article provides a detailed comparison between DIN Abrasion Tester and Taber Abraser, covering their working principles, specimen requirements, industry applications, standard compliance, technical characteristics, operation features and practical advantages. DIN Abrasion Tester is mainly designed for rubber, elastic materials, tires, conveyor belts and footwear soles, while Taber Abrasion Tester is suitable for flat materials such as coatings, textiles, plastics, leather, metals and decorative surfaces.

By understanding the differences between these two abrasion testing methods, laboratories can select the most suitable abrasion tester based on sample geometry, testing standards and production quality control requirements.
10 Benefits of GESTER PPE Testing Equipment You Need to Know
Choosing PPE testing equipment requires more than comparing machine prices. Measurement accuracy, test repeatability, applicable standards, fixture design, automation, calibration, customization and technical support can directly affect laboratory efficiency and testing reliability. GESTER provides integrated PPE testing solutions covering safety footwear, protective gloves, protective clothing, masks and safety helmets. This article explains 10 technical advantages to consider when comparing GESTER PPE Testing Equipment with alternative suppliers.
Why GESTER Ranks as a Leading TPP Thermal Protective Performance Tester Exporter
As a trusted leading TPP Thermal Protective Performance Tester exporter, GESTER International Co., Ltd. brings 25+ years of R&D and manufacturing expertise to PPE safety testing. Our flagship GT-RC02 series TPP testers feature advanced dual-source thermal simulation, high-sensitivity sensors, and full digital automation—delivering precise, repeatable data to evaluate thermal protection for firefighter and industrial protective clothing. Fully compliant with global standards (NFPA 1971, EN 469, ISO), GESTER’s equipment is trusted by SGS, Intertek, and top testing institutes worldwide. Backed by ISO 9001 certification, global service in 160+ countries, and professional calibration support, we empower manufacturers and labs to meet stringent safety regulations and ensure life-saving thermal protection. Discover tailored TPP testing solutions for PPE excellence at GESTER.
Analysis of Pilling Influencing Factors and Testing Methods
Pilling testing plays a vital role in textile quality control, helping manufacturers evaluate and improve the wear performance of fabrics. Through the use of advanced instruments like ICI Pilling Box Test Method (GT-C18) , Martindale Abrasion Test Method (GT-C13B) , and Random Tumble Pilling Test Method (GT-C19A) , laboratories can conduct precise and standardized assessments, ensuring that final textile products deliver superior appearance, comfort, and longevity.
GESTER International Co., Ltd. gains certificates of ISO 9001, 3A and SGS Audited supplier etc. with advanced design concept, excellent manufacturing technology and strict quality control.
WeChat
Contact us
Tel: +86-595-28886108 
Fax: +86-595-22515221
E-mail: sales10@gester-instruments.com,
                 info@gester-instruments.com
Mobile/Whatapp/ Wechat:  
             + 86(0)18059985379
Address:  No.15, Chifeng Road,Licheng Region, Quanzhou city of Fujian,PR China.
Customer service
detect