loading

PPE Testing Equipment Manufacturer | Safety Equipment Testing Machines | GESTER


Products

Comparative Analysis of Textile Color Fastness Standards to Dry Cleaning

The current national standard for evaluating the color fastness to dry cleaning of textile and clothing products is GB/T5711-1997 'Textile color fastness test for color fastness to dry cleaning'. The most influential foreign standard for evaluating this index is ISO 105- D01:2010 and AATCC TM 132–2009. GB/T5711–1997 adopts ISO105-D01:1993 equivalently, and ISO 105-D01:1993 has been replaced by ISO 105-D01:2010. In order to explore the difference of the test standards in evaluating the color fastness of textiles to dry cleaning, 10 samples were selected in this paper, and they were tested and analyzed according to the standards of GB/T5711-1997 and ISO 105-D01:2010. Test equipment and materials Test materials: corrosion-resistant stainless steel discs, undyed cotton twill, perchloroethylene, single-fiber series and multi-fiber (DW type) of standard lining fabrics for color fastness test, gray sample card for evaluating discoloration , Gray sample card and colorimetric tube for evaluating staining. During the test, 10 samples were tested according to GB/T5711-1997 and ISO 105-D01:2010. Among them, when testing according to ISO 105-D01:2010, the standard lining fabrics are selected from cotton, viscose, silk, wool, polyester, nylon and multi-fiber (DW type) as required. The gray scale is used to evaluate the discoloration, solvent staining of the sample and the staining grade of the standard lining fabric. From the data analysis, it can be seen that for most samples, the results obtained by the ISO 105-D01:2010 test are generally better than the results obtained by the GB/T5711-1997 test. In my country, GB/T5711-1997 is widely cited in the product standards of woven garments as a test method for evaluating the color fastness to dry cleaning, such as GB/T2664–2009 'Men's suits and coatsThe evaluation indicators for the color fastness to dry cleaning in these product standards are excellent products ≥ 4-5, first-class products ≥ 4, and qualified products ≥ 3-4. However, if the color fastness to dry cleaning of the sample is tested according to the ISO 105-D01:2010 standard, the result will be greatly changed when evaluated according to the existing product standard, or even change the evaluation conclusion, that is, part of the conformity is qualified. The new test results of products required by product indicators will meet the requirements of first-class or even superior products, and there will be many unqualified samples that will meet the current product standards for dry-cleaning fastness requirements, and even Meet the requirements of first-class products. In our country's standardization activities, our country's standards are generally formulated on the basis of existing international standards (including international standards that are about to be completed). GB/T5711-1997 is equivalent to ISO105-D01:1993. ISO 105-D01:2010 replaced ISO 105-D01:1993 on 2010-05-01, so GB/T5711 will be revised in accordance with the new international standard ISO 105-D01:2010 when it is revised. Both are in technical content. The above should be equivalent. In this way, the update of the aforementioned test standards for color fastness to dry cleaning will have an impact on the evaluation conclusions of many products. In terms of the current technical methods for evaluating the color fastness of textiles to dry cleaning, ISO 105-D01:2010 uses standard lining fabrics to evaluate the staining of the sample’s color fastness to dry cleaning, eliminating the previous assessment of the staining level of the reagent after dry cleaning. The practice represents a new development trend. Currently, the vast majority of dry cleaning reagents are perchloroethylene. The used tetrachloroethylene is distilled through the distillation system of the dry cleaning machine and then becomes clean tetrachloroethylene washing liquid again. The next time it is used, it is clean washing liquid. Therefore, from a practical point of view, evaluate the staining grade of the reagent after dry cleaning. The approach is of little significance. In a dry cleaning process, it is very possible to mix and wash clothes of multiple colors. Therefore, it is more common for the dyes peeled off from the clothes to contaminate other clothes. Therefore, the ISO105-D01:2010 evaluation standard is used for the stained fabric after dry cleaning. The color grading method has good practical value. Another relatively influential American Association of Textile Chemists and Dyeing Scientists test standard AATCC TM 132 adopted this method very early. Conclusions and Suggestions The current national standard GB/T5711–1997 will cause some fabrics that 'satisfy the requirements' to be discarded in technical content, or need to be treated with additional dyeing and finishing processes, which will lead to the use of 'threshold' for some fabrics. Unnecessary elevation and the consumption of unnecessary water, electricity, steam, labor and other resources in the additional dyeing and finishing process. This deviates from the current national advocates of reducing energy consumption and saving energy. It is not suitable for the current 'low' Carbon” trend. It should be revised according to new technological development trends and released for implementation as soon as possible. In order to avoid the occurrence of similar situations, it is recommended that the relevant national technical committees strengthen communication, and timely understand and grasp the technical trends of the relevant international standardization organizations, early detection, research and resolution of technical linkage issues between related standards, so that the standards are released and implemented The time and technical content are more suitable for our national conditions, better promote the improvement of our product quality, and then promote economic development. More about: Textile Testing Instruments

The importance of textile testing equipment has increased as tensile tester manufacturers have become a must in our daily life.

If you follow these straightforward steps you can keep your tensile tester manufacturers tensile tester manufacturers. I think this article will help you make a wise decision on choosing the right .

The major classifications of are tensile tester manufacturers, tensile tester manufacturers, tensile tester manufacturers and tensile tester manufacturers machines.

GESTER International Co.,Limited understands how essential it is to offer ample options, such as textile testing equipmenttensile tester manufacturers to afford high-quality products for customers.

GET IN TOUCH WITH Us
recommended articles
ISO 20345 vs ASTM F2413: Differences Between Safety Footwear Standards
ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413 are the two most recognized safety footwear standards used worldwide to evaluate protective footwear performance. Although both standards define minimum requirements for impact resistance and compression protection, differences in test energy levels, compression loads, marking systems, and hazard classifications can affect certification results. This article explains the key differences between ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413, helping footwear manufacturers, exporters, and quality control teams select the correct testing standard and improve compliance with international safety requirements.
Sweating Guarded Hotplate Buying Guide
Choosing the right Sweating Guarded Hotplate is essential for obtaining accurate thermal resistance (Rct) and water vapor resistance (Ret) data for textiles. This guide explains how Sweating Guarded Hotplate testing works, introduces international standards including ISO 11092 and ASTM F1868, compares the most important purchasing considerations, and answers common questions from textile laboratories and apparel manufacturers.
What is the Safety Glove & Shoe Upper Cutting Tester GT-KC29
The Safety Glove & Shoe Upper Cutting Tester GT-KC29 is a high-precision testing instrument developed to measure the cut resistance performance of safety gloves and footwear uppers. In industrial and construction environments where sharp tools and metal edges pose significant injury risks, the GT-KC29 provides a reliable evaluation method by simulating real cutting motion. This tester meets EN 388 section 6.2, ISO 20344:2021 section 5.23, GB/T 20991 section 6.14, and other global standards, making it essential for PPE manufacturers, testing laboratories, and quality control departments. With automated operation, high repeatability, and multi-standard compliance, it helps companies improve product safety levels, enhance global competitiveness, and ensure superior protection for end users.
How to Choose a PPE Testing Equipment Manufacturer: 10 Things to Check
Choosing the right PPE testing equipment manufacturer is an important decision for PPE manufacturers, testing laboratories, certification bodies, research institutions, and quality inspection organizations. The right supplier should provide more than individual testing machines—it should offer standards-compliant equipment, reliable measurement performance, calibration support, technical expertise, customization, and long-term service. This guide explains 10 essential factors to check before selecting a PPE testing equipment manufacturer.
10 Benefits of GESTER PPE Testing Equipment You Need to Know
Choosing PPE testing equipment requires more than comparing machine prices. Measurement accuracy, test repeatability, applicable standards, fixture design, automation, calibration, customization and technical support can directly affect laboratory efficiency and testing reliability. GESTER provides integrated PPE testing solutions covering safety footwear, protective gloves, protective clothing, masks and safety helmets. This article explains 10 technical advantages to consider when comparing GESTER PPE Testing Equipment with alternative suppliers.
DIN Abrasion Tester vs Taber Abraser: What Is the Difference?

Choosing the right abrasion testing equipment is essential for obtaining accurate and repeatable wear resistance results. DIN Abrasion Tester and Taber Abrasion Tester are two widely used abrasion testing machines, but they are designed for different material types and testing purposes.

This article provides a detailed comparison between DIN Abrasion Tester and Taber Abraser, covering their working principles, specimen requirements, industry applications, standard compliance, technical characteristics, operation features and practical advantages. DIN Abrasion Tester is mainly designed for rubber, elastic materials, tires, conveyor belts and footwear soles, while Taber Abrasion Tester is suitable for flat materials such as coatings, textiles, plastics, leather, metals and decorative surfaces.

By understanding the differences between these two abrasion testing methods, laboratories can select the most suitable abrasion tester based on sample geometry, testing standards and production quality control requirements.
What is Air Permeability Tester? Detailed Overview and Benefits

The air permeability tester is a high-precision testing instrument designed to evaluate the breathability of PPE materials, textile fabrics, non-woven fabrics, woven fabrics, and industrial filter media. It plays a critical role in quality control, product development, and laboratory research across multiple industries including PPE, textiles, automotive interiors, and filtration systems.

Modern instruments such as the GT-C27 Air Permeability Tester are developed with advanced sensor systems, automated control logic, and multi-standard compatibility to ensure reliable and repeatable results. Complying with global standards such as ISO 9237, ASTM D737, DIN 53887, and GB/T 5453, it guarantees internationally recognized testing performance.

With high automation, accurate pressure sensing, and flexible unit conversion systems, air permeability testing equipment significantly improves testing efficiency while reducing human error. It is widely used in PPE manufacturing, textile engineering, non-woven product development, and industrial filtration quality inspection.
Safety Footwear Test Explained: Compression and Puncture Tester
This article fully explains the working principle, applicable international standards, test advantages and application scope of safety footwear compression and puncture tester GT-KB12A. It covers core protective performance testing of safety shoe toecap and sole steel plate, complies with GB, ISO, EN, ASTM and other global standards, and serves manufacturers, third-party labs and safety footwear R&D institutions for quality control .
 Fabric Pilling Test: How to Choose the Right ICI Pilling Box Tester GT-C18
Fabric pilling directly affects the appearance, durability, and perceived quality of textile products. With global textile brands enforcing stricter testing standards, reliable laboratory testing equipment has become essential for manufacturers. This article explores how fabric pilling tests are conducted and why textile laboratories increasingly invest in professional ICI pilling box testers such as the GT-C18. It explains the advantages of in-house testing, international compliance requirements, key machine components, and important parameters buyers should evaluate before purchasing a pilling tester. By selecting the right equipment, textile companies can achieve faster quality verification, reduce dependence on third-party laboratories, and ensure their fabrics consistently meet international market standards.
EN ISO 20345 Safety Footwear Standard — How to Choose the ISO 20345 Tester
EN ISO 20345 is the core international standard for general-purpose safety footwear, defining minimum performance requirements for foot protection against various workplace hazards. This article elaborates on the definition, key highlights and mainstream safety classes of the EN ISO 20345 standard, covering applicable industry scenarios. It further provides a systematic step-by-step guide for selecting qualified ISO 20345 testing equipment, involving test item confirmation, equipment performance evaluation and reliable supplier selection. Finally, it introduces professional ISO 20345-compliant testing solutions provided by GESTER for footwear manufacturers and third-party testing institutions.
GESTER International Co., Ltd. gains certificates of ISO 9001, 3A and SGS Audited supplier etc. with advanced design concept, excellent manufacturing technology and strict quality control.
WeChat
Contact us
Tel: +86-595-28886108 
Fax: +86-595-22515221
E-mail: sales10@gester-instruments.com,
                 info@gester-instruments.com
Mobile/Whatapp/ Wechat:  
             + 86(0)18059985379
Address:  No.15, Chifeng Road,Licheng Region, Quanzhou city of Fujian,PR China.
Customer service
detect