loading

PPE Testing Equipment Manufacturer | Safety Equipment Testing Machines | GESTER


Products

Determination method of sunscreen index of cosmetics

The purpose of this study is to establish a method for the determination of the SPF of cosmetics consistent with ISO by measuring the SPF of sunscreen ingredients and comparing the consistency of in vitro and in vivo detection methods. Research contents 1. Sun protection factor (SPF) test of 12 sunscreen cosmetic ingredients; 2. Long-wave UV protection index (PFA value) determination of 6 sunscreen cosmetic ingredients; 3. Applicability of testing according to ISO sunscreen function testing method. Test substance 1. The sunscreen agent is selected from 14 kinds of sunscreen agents limited in the 'Hygienic Standards for Cosmetics (2007 Edition)', and the concentration is set to the maximum allowable concentration. Among them, 12 kinds of SPF values ​​were determined, and 6 kinds of PA values ​​were determined. The relevant information is shown in Table 1. 2. Reference substance PA: S1 is 4.0 (ISO24442 reference value is 4.4±0.6); SPF: 4.0 for P7 (ISO24444 reference value is 4.4±0.4). Subjects All subjects are required to sign a written informed consent form after being informed of the relevant contents of the trial. All trials should comply with the basic principles of the International Declaration of Helsinki and national regulations on human trials. 1. Inclusion criteria 1.1 Select healthy volunteers aged 18~60 years old, both male and female. 1.2 SPF measurement Subject requirements: skin type II or III, that is, sensitive to sunlight or ultraviolet radiation, and prone to appear after exposure Those who are sunburned and less prone to hyperpigmentation; and the subject's skin colorimetric ITA°Value should be > 28°. 1.3 Subject requirements for PA determination: light skin type III or IV, that is, those with different degrees of pigmentation after the skin is irradiated by ultraviolet rays; and the subject's skin colorimetric ITA°value at 20°to 41°between. Exclusion criteria 2.1 Past history of photosensitivity disease or recent use of drugs or foods that affect skin photosensitivity 2.2 Immunosuppressive drugs used within the past month 2.3 Oral or topical use of anti-inflammatory drugs such as corticosteroids recently 2.4 Skin of the test site Pigmentation, inflammation, scars, pigmented moles, hirsutism, etc. 2.5 Lactating or pregnant women 2.6 Patients with immunodeficiency or autoimmune diseases, such as HIV-positive patients or patients who have undergone organ transplantation Cancer chemotherapy or radiotherapy 2.8 Those who cannot avoid frequent sun exposure at the test site 2.9 Those who have a highly sensitive constitution 2.10 Those who have undergone similar experiments in the past two months The number of subjects The number of subjects in each test should be no less than 10, and the maximum number of subjects is 25. Test method 1. Test method for sun protection factor (SPF) of sunscreen cosmetics 1.1 Selection of standard reference substance If the expected SPF value is less than 20, any of the following standard reference substances can be used: P2, P3 or P7. SPF as expected≥20. One of the following standard controls can be used: P2 or P3. If a high SPF standard reference substance is used, even if a low SPF value test sample is detected in the experiment, there is no need to use a low SPF value standard reference substance for control. 1.2 The artificial light source used for the light source must be a xenon arc lamp daylight simulator with a filter system. The UV heliostat should emit a continuous spectrum with no gaps or extreme emission peaks in the UV region. The light source output of the UV simulator should be stable and uniform over the entire beam cross-section, and must be equipped with an appropriate filtering system so that the spectral characteristics of the output meet acceptable limits. The spectral features are described by the cumulative erythema effect in the continuous waveband from 290nm to 400nm. The erythema effect of each band can be expressed as a percentage value of the total erythema effect at 290nm-400nm, that is, the relative cumulative erythema effect (%RCEE) (Relative Cumulative Erythemal Effectiveness).

GESTER International Co.,Limited is famous for creating innovative products like the textile testing equipment and supporting their market leadership with savvy marketing campaigns to build an elite brand.

To know more about and the market trends, go to GESTER Instruments.

We focus on operational procedure and manufacturing facilities of textile testing equipment.

GET IN TOUCH WITH Us
recommended articles
DIN Abrasion Tester vs Taber Abraser: What Is the Difference?

Choosing the right abrasion testing equipment is essential for obtaining accurate and repeatable wear resistance results. DIN Abrasion Tester and Taber Abrasion Tester are two widely used abrasion testing machines, but they are designed for different material types and testing purposes.

This article provides a detailed comparison between DIN Abrasion Tester and Taber Abraser, covering their working principles, specimen requirements, industry applications, standard compliance, technical characteristics, operation features and practical advantages. DIN Abrasion Tester is mainly designed for rubber, elastic materials, tires, conveyor belts and footwear soles, while Taber Abrasion Tester is suitable for flat materials such as coatings, textiles, plastics, leather, metals and decorative surfaces.

By understanding the differences between these two abrasion testing methods, laboratories can select the most suitable abrasion tester based on sample geometry, testing standards and production quality control requirements.
 Fabric Pilling Test: How to Choose the Right ICI Pilling Box Tester GT-C18
Fabric pilling directly affects the appearance, durability, and perceived quality of textile products. With global textile brands enforcing stricter testing standards, reliable laboratory testing equipment has become essential for manufacturers. This article explores how fabric pilling tests are conducted and why textile laboratories increasingly invest in professional ICI pilling box testers such as the GT-C18. It explains the advantages of in-house testing, international compliance requirements, key machine components, and important parameters buyers should evaluate before purchasing a pilling tester. By selecting the right equipment, textile companies can achieve faster quality verification, reduce dependence on third-party laboratories, and ensure their fabrics consistently meet international market standards.
ISO 20345 vs ASTM F2413: Differences Between Safety Footwear Standards
ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413 are the two most recognized safety footwear standards used worldwide to evaluate protective footwear performance. Although both standards define minimum requirements for impact resistance and compression protection, differences in test energy levels, compression loads, marking systems, and hazard classifications can affect certification results. This article explains the key differences between ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413, helping footwear manufacturers, exporters, and quality control teams select the correct testing standard and improve compliance with international safety requirements.
How to Choose the Right Safety Shoes Testing Equipment Supplier?
Safety shoes are essential personal protective equipment (PPE) in high-risk industries. To ensure compliance with international standards such as EN ISO 20345 and ASTM F2413, professional testing equipment is required. This article explains common safety shoes test items, corresponding testing machines, and how to choose a reliable safety shoes testing machine supplier. It also analyzes key factors such as technical capability, standard compliance, equipment stability, and cost performance to help enterprises build a strong quality control system and enhance global competitiveness.
Leather Industry Innovations: GESTER at ACLE as a Footwear Testing Equipment Factory
The global leather and footwear industry is shifting toward prioritizing durability, material integrity, and functional excellence—driving demand for high-precision testing equipment. As a highlight of ACLE 2026 (All China Leather Exhibition), GESTER International Co., Ltd., a 25+ year footwear testing equipment factory, showcases innovative solutions tailored to this trend. Trusted by leading testing institutes like SGS, TUV, and Intertek, GESTER’s product lineup includes the Martindale Abrasion Tester (for surface durability), Tension Testing Machine (for mechanical properties), and Safety Shoe Cutting Tester—all compliant with ISO, ASTM, and EN standards. These instruments integrate automation (PLC systems) and data traceability to reduce human error, support ISO 9001 compliance, and streamline laboratory efficiency. With a global service network spanning 160+ countries, GESTER offers on-site installation, calibration, and software updates to ensure long-term usability. The article also outlines strategic procurement tips for manufacturers, emphasizing modular design, standard compatibility, and supplier track records. For leather and footwear brands seeking to enhance product reliability, avoid recalls, and stay competitive, GESTER’s ACLE 2026 innovations and end-to-end support provide a definitive quality assurance solution.
Top Features of a Certified TDM Cut Resistance Tester Supplier for Laboratory Use
The demand for precise PPE safety testing has surged with the evolution of protective gear, making TDM (Tomodynamometer) cut resistance testing a critical process for evaluating protective gloves and industrial textiles. This article details the top features of a certified TDM cut resistance tester supplier for laboratory use, including compliance with international standards (EN 388, ISO 13997, ASTM F2992), high-precision mechanical engineering, automated workflows, robust data management, and integrated safety features. It highlights GESTER International Co., Ltd.—a 20+ year experienced manufacturer with ISO 9001 certification and partnerships with SGS, Intertek, and TUV—as a leading supplier, offering the GT-KC28 TDM Cut Test Machine and comprehensive services (on-site installation, calibration, global technical support). For laboratories seeking reliable, standard-compliant testing solutions to validate PPE safety claims, this article provides actionable insights into strategic procurement. Visit https://www.gesterinstruments.com/ for more technical specifications and PPE testing solutions.
What is EN 149 & Why is it Important?
EN 149 is the core European standard for particle-filtering half masks and FFP respirators. This article elaborates on the definition, structure, performance classification, marking rules and core advantages of EN 149, compares it with NIOSH N95, KN95, EN 143 and medical mask standards, and lists industry application scenarios, as well as professional mask and filter testing instruments compliant with EN 149 testing requirements.
PPE Testing Laboratory Equipment List
Setting up a PPE testing laboratory requires the right combination of instruments for safety footwear, gloves, protective clothing, masks and safety helmets. This guide explains the core testing equipment used in modern PPE laboratories, the standards they support, and the functions of each instrument, helping manufacturers, third-party laboratories and certification bodies choose a reliable and compliant testing setup.
How to Choose a PPE Testing Equipment Manufacturer: 10 Things to Check
Choosing the right PPE testing equipment manufacturer is an important decision for PPE manufacturers, testing laboratories, certification bodies, research institutions, and quality inspection organizations. The right supplier should provide more than individual testing machines—it should offer standards-compliant equipment, reliable measurement performance, calibration support, technical expertise, customization, and long-term service. This guide explains 10 essential factors to check before selecting a PPE testing equipment manufacturer.
10 Benefits of GESTER PPE Testing Equipment You Need to Know
Choosing PPE testing equipment requires more than comparing machine prices. Measurement accuracy, test repeatability, applicable standards, fixture design, automation, calibration, customization and technical support can directly affect laboratory efficiency and testing reliability. GESTER provides integrated PPE testing solutions covering safety footwear, protective gloves, protective clothing, masks and safety helmets. This article explains 10 technical advantages to consider when comparing GESTER PPE Testing Equipment with alternative suppliers.
GESTER International Co., Ltd. gains certificates of ISO 9001, 3A and SGS Audited supplier etc. with advanced design concept, excellent manufacturing technology and strict quality control.
WeChat
Contact us
Tel: +86-595-28886108 
Fax: +86-595-22515221
E-mail: sales10@gester-instruments.com,
                 info@gester-instruments.com
Mobile/Whatapp/ Wechat:  
             + 86(0)18059985379
Address:  No.15, Chifeng Road,Licheng Region, Quanzhou city of Fujian,PR China.
Customer service
detect